Filed under: employment

The New Poor - The Economy Shifts, Leaving Some Behind

Additionally, the unemployment numbers show a notable split in the labor pool, with most unemployed workers finding jobs after a relatively short period of time, but a sizable chunk of the labor force unable to find new work even after months or years of searching. This group — comprising generally older workers — has pulled up the average length of time that a current worker has been unemployed to a record high of 33 weeks as of April. The percentage of unemployed people who have been looking for jobs for more than six months is at 45.9 percent, the highest in at least six decades.[...]

Of course, just as there is a structural decline in some industries, others enjoy structural growth (the “creative” part of “creative destruction”). The key is to prepare the group of workers left behind for the growing industry.[...]

“You can bring the jobs back for some of these people, but they won’t be in the same place,” says Thomas Anton Kochan, a professor of management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

I find baffling just how much time and energy we put into trying to save jobs that are becoming obsolete. Employing people is obviously very important, but productivity is what fuels job growth and prosperity in the long run. Employing people by holding back productivity growth is not a viable long-term strategy.

People vs. Patents - #INNOCHAT Feb 4 @ 12 EST

Henry Chesbrough's "Open Innovation" was based on the idea that "not all the smart people work for you." Simple but brilliant. 

Yet Chesbrough's Open Innovation solution has everything to do with moving ideas and nothing to do with the movement of those smart people who create them. It deals with secondary markets in intellectual property but doesn't seem to consider the "exchange" of individuals.

This is particularly problematic because: 
  1. Innovation is largely about the novel combination of existing ideas. Being to able to assemble a group of creative people with complementary ideas and skills is critical to innovation and entrepreneurship.
  2. The free movement of people between companies is being increasingly restricted through the use of non-compete and non-solicitation clauses in employment agreements. 
Once reserved for the highest level executives, non-compete agreements are now being used at all levels in many organizations, and law firms are ratcheting up their non-compete practices in order to help corporate clients protect their businesses (more on that here). 

Some see this trend as positive insofar as it protects companies' IP and thus provides greater incentives to innovate (similar to the patent system). Others view the net impact as negative since the broader process of innovation is hampered in a way that damages the welfare of both society and, ultimately, individual companies.

What do you think?

Next week's #INNOCHAT will be about the appropriate role of non-compete and non-solication clauses in promoting innovation. We'll discuss some of the following questions:
  1. Is this a passing fad, or should we be concerned about a potential future in which creative individuals are severely restricted in their ability to contribute their ideas and skills where they would have the greatest impact?
  2. Do more restrictive employment agreements benefit society by providing greater incentives to companies to innovate? (California is decidedly anti-non-compete, as is most of Europe, while Massachusetts is perhaps the most pro-non-compete state in the US.)
  3. Do more restrictive employment agreements harm or benefit the companies who administer them?
  4. What are the implications for a country's ability to innovate and compete globally if some are more pro- or anti-non-compete than others?
  5. How does an organization strike the right balance in its employment agreements between protecting its own IP and supporting a broader system that nurtures innovation?
Please post any additional questions or framing comments below, and join us on Twitter at 12pm EST on Feb 4th for more!  
I'm looking forward to it!